NNER Equity Study Committee Recommendations to the NNER Governing Council
presented October 11, 2003 at the NNER
Annual Meeting in Salt Lake City

PRIMARY CHARGE

How do we promote a future where people with different beliefs, values, and personal identities successfully live together in a democratic society?

EQUITY STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The NNER Equity Study Committee has written a Statement on Equity that articulates a number of principles derived from the Agenda for Education in a Democracy, that define the concept of equity in more specificity. The Committee believes that this new level of definition is necessary for the NNER to work effectively on equity issues. The Statement on Equity is followed by a number of recommendations for action to be taken by the NNER and by each of the member settings. The Committee recommends that the NNER Governing Council formally adopt the Statement and the Action Plans and communicate them to the member settings.

SECONDARY CHARGE #1

What principles of the Agenda for Education in a Democracy (reviewed in Fenstermacher’s article) should NNER encourage it members to consider when developing policy?

EQUITY STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The NNER Equity Study Committee recommends that the NNER Governing Council formally adopt the following Statement on Equity and communicate it to all member settings.

NNER STATEMENT ON EQUITY

The NNER embraces a vision of educational excellence for all. This vision, described in The Agenda for Education in a Democracy, brings to light the symbiotic relationship between educational excellence and equity. By definition, educational excellence involves knowledge, practices and structures that support the full participation of all individuals in teaching and learning opportunities, and in educational decision-making and policy setting.

The NNER advocates strong legal and policy frameworks and cultural practices, in educational and other social settings, that promote the elimination of all discrimination against groups historically oppressed on the basis of traits including but not limited to age, disability, gender, language, locality, personal appearance, political ideology, race, religion, sexual orientation and socio-economic status. Moreover, given that these forms of discrimination permeate our society, including educational institutions, it is important that NNER members act in ways that are explicitly and purposefully anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-classist, anti-homophobic, etc.

The NNER further recognizes that inequities surface continually as democratic institutions adapt to changing circumstances, and that consequently, constant vigilance is needed to identify obstacles and barriers to educational access, opportunity and attainment. The NNER sponsors and encourages proactive, critical inquiry at all educational levels—from the classroom to national policy arenas—into (a) conditions that limit educational access, opportunity and attainment, and (b) practices that promote educational access, opportunity and attainment.

The NNER believes that democracy is strengthened by diversity. Diversity is an indispensable feature of the NNER’s commitment to using democratic processes to facilitate democratic ends. At a minimum, this commitment to diversity requires the inclusion of the historically oppressed groups mentioned above in all democratic processes, on a basis of equal respect. More broadly, it includes educating ourselves about others and demonstrating a willingness to fairly consider multiple views. Thus, the NNER supports active engagement and broad representation in forging educational and other social and political decisions.

The NNER recognizes that there are many ways to ameliorate problems of inequity and lack of diversity consistent with this Statement on Equity and therefore expects that local responses will differ. Further, the NNER does not expect that any of its member settings have fully realized the ideals of equity and diversity described in this Statement, but expects, rather, that each member setting is committed to working toward these ideals.

SECONDARY CHARGE #2

What is the role of the NNER in promoting opportunities for people regardless of individual differences (age, disability, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, etc.)?

EQUITY STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

In order to operationalize the commitments articulated in the Statement on Equity, The NNER Equity Study Committee recommends that the NNER Governing Council commit to an Equity Action Plan such as the one presented here.

NNER EQUITY ACTION PLAN

The NNER recognizes and applauds the work of NNER administrators, councilors and advisors who have contributed to the understanding and the realization of educational and social equity. In order to advance this work the NNER commits to take the following actions:

  • Appoint or hire an individual whose sole focus is on issues of equity within the NNER.
  • Charter an on-going NNER Equity Taskforce advising the Tripartite Council on these issues.
  • Include commitment to the NNER Statement on Equity as a criterion for NNER membership.
  • Continue to consider the diversity of the NNER in inviting new member settings.
  • Consider the diversity of NNER councils and committees in inviting representatives to serve on them.
  • Include keynote speakers from diverse backgrounds for all NNER meetings.
  • Create a standing strand within NNER meetings for presentations related to equity, rotating specific themes annually. Examples of themes include:
    • The interrelationship of age, disability, gender, language, personal appearance, political ideology, race, religion, sexual orientation and socio-economic status
    • Connections between commitment to diversity and academic achievement
  • Provide knowledge, practices and structures for mentoring teacher candidates, school and higher education faculty, leaders and policy makers toward being culturally responsive to all.
  • Provide on-line resources (e.g. articles, books, contact information) addressing equity and diversity on the NNER website.
  • Continue to invite Leadership Associates Program participants from diverse backgrounds.
  • Include more focus on equity in the Leadership Associates Program curriculum.
  • Partner with other organizations focused on issues related to equity and diversity (e.g. NAME and AERA social justice SIG’s).
  • Participate visibly in national policy debates relevant to equity.
  • Host national public conversations on issues of equity in education.
  • Cultivate national leaders as change agents for equity.

SECONDARY CHARGE #2

How can we encourage NNER members to regularly examine their own policies and practices so that they advance the principles of the Agenda?

EQUITY STUDY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

In order to operationalize the commitments articulated in the Statement on Equity, the NNER Equity Study Committee recommends that NNER member settings commit to Equity Action Plans such as the one presented here.

NNER MEMBER SETTINGS EQUITY ACTION PLAN

The NNER recognizes and applauds the work of NNER member settings—including colleges of education, colleges of arts and sciences and public schools—that have contributed to the understanding and the realization of educational and social equity. In order to advance this work NNER member settings commit to take the following actions:

  • Create taskforces on equity issues within each setting.
  • Submit annual equity reports to the NNER Equity Taskforce, that may include but are not limited to:
    • Faculty and student demographics
    • Examination of policies relevant to equity
    • Equity initiatives undertaken, and results
    • Scholarship relevant to equity
  • Hold candidates, faculty, leaders and policy makers accountable for equity standards by collecting evidence.
  • Provide incentives to groups and individuals within the setting to conduct inquiry focusing on equity.
  • Conduct and support collaborative research within and across NNER settings dealing with equity.
  • Bring presentations to the NNER conferences focusing on equity.
  • Prepare teachers who can lead critical classroom inquiry into equity issues.
  • Participate visibly in local policy debates relevant to equity.
  • Cultivate local leaders as change agents for equity.

IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES

The NNER Equity Study Committee raises the following issues that were not directly addressed at its meeting of October 9, 2003, that will need to be decided if its recommendations are to be implemented:

Procedural Questions

  • Should the above recommendations be ratified by the Governing council or by all settings?
  • Should the above recommendations be ratified by majority vote or by consensus?
  • What sort of discussion should precede ratification?

Accountability Questions

  • How should the equity policies of NNER members be evaluated?
  • What should constitute breach of NNER’s equity commitment?

Implementation Questions

  • How should the specific recommendations in the Equity Plans be prioritized?
  • Should issues such as tripartite representation and simultaneity ever outweigh equity issues in decisions about membership in the NNER?
  • What should be the responsibility and the accountability of NNER settings when a particular institution in the setting acts in contravention of the Statement on Equity (e.g. the decision of a school board on religion or sexual orientation)?

EQUITY STUDY COMMITTEE

Julie Andrzejewski, St. Cloud State University
Tom Bellamy, University of Colorado at Denver
Julie Canniff, University of Southern Maine
Deb Carr, University of Missouri—Columbia
Gary Daynes, Brigham Young University
Annette Digby, The City University of New York
Maughn Rollins Gregory, Montclair State University
Lonny Hoffman, Wyoming Fremont County School District 14
Jodi Jaques, Cal Poly State University
Bill McDiarmid, University of Washington
Jean McGivney-Burelle, University of Connecticut
Margaret Maaka, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Molly Munson-Dryer, Illinois State University
Judith Munter, University of Texas at El Paso
Sherry Palmer, University of Wyoming
Francisco Rios, University of Wyoming
Sam Stack, West Virginia University
Paul Theobald, Wayne State College
Nancy Williams, Maryville University

Equity Study Committee Consultants

Cori Mantle-Bromley, Institute for Educational Inquiry
Nicholas Michelli, The City University of New York
Marue Walizer, Princeton University (Committee Facilitator)

Equity Study Committee Writing Team

Deb Carr, University of Missouri—Columbia
Maughn Rollins Gregory, Montclair State University
Sam Stack, West Virginia University

Equity Study Committee Liaison with NNER Governing Council

Maughn Rollins Gregory, Montclair State University

[Close Window]

Copyright © 2005 National Network for Educational Renewal. All rights reserved.